Author Archives: macyls

Project Gutenberg

Project Gutenberg is an online resource that contains over sixty thousand eBooks. Project Gutenberg and all of its contents are completely free and accessible through any internet browser. The website is easy to navigate and is organized by categories and subcategories. Additionally, a user can also browse the catalogue by author, title, language, or the recently posted tab. Project Gutenberg’s database contains books from numerous time periods and of every genre. For example, a user can find anything from the King James version of The Bible to Herman Melville’s Moby Dick and Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley’s Frankenstein. Another interesting feature of Project Gutenberg is the format in which it makes books available. Yes, all sixty thousand eBooks are available as just that, digital books, but a great number of those books are also available as audiobooks. 

The founder, Michael Hart, started Project Gutenberg in 1971 when he was given $100,000,000 worth of computer time to do with as he pleased by the Xerox Sigma V mainframe operators at the University of Illinois’ Materials Research Lab. Hart decided that he would create a database that would “make information, books and other materials available to the general public in forms a vast majority of the computers, programs and people can easily read, use, quote, and search” (Hart). Upon creating Project Gutenberg, Hart decided that “[all] Etexts should cost so little that no one will really care how much they cost. They should be a general size that fits on the standard media of the time … [and] the Project Gutenberg Etexts should be so easily used that no one should ever have to care about how to use, read, quote and search them …” (Hart). 

Works Cited

Project Gutenberg. 17 Sept. 2019, http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Main_Page.

Hart, Michael. “The History and Philosophy of Project Gutenberg.” Project Gutenberg, 1992, http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Gutenberg:The_History_and_ Philosophy_of_Project_Gutenberg_by_Michael_Hart.

Leave a comment

Filed under Profile

Google Docs

Google Docs is a free online word processor that is offered by Google as a part of its Google Driveservice. Within that free service and in addition to Google Docs, Google Driveservice also includes Google Sheets, a spreadsheet program, and Google Slides, a presentation program. Google Docs and its sister programs are accessible through an app on phones or computers, or it can be accessed directly through a search engine, such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Microsoft Edge, and Internet Explorer. Therefore, Google Docs is widely accessible, in fact, Google’s mission as a whole is “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful” (“Google Docs Online”). 

In addition to its easy accessibility, Google Docs also offers many attractive features for students and english students in particular. The most popular features include commenting and real-time editing, unlimited revision history, the ability to work across devices with or without internet, easy-to-manage sharing controls, and integrated add-ons. Commenting and real-time editing are noteworthy features because they allow students to collaborate on the same document instantaneously, whether that be notes during a lecture, group projects, or papers. Also, it’s easy-to-manage sharing controls are a key feature that allow the user to decide who gets access to his documents and folders and grant certain individuals or groups the right to edit, view, or make comments. Additionally, the integrated add-ons allow a user to research topics, define words, and insert citations directly in the Google Docs document. All in all, Google docs is universal, easy to use, and more advanced than most typical word processors. 

Works Cited

“Google Docs.” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, Wikimedia Foundation, Inc, 16 Apr. 2015, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Docs.

Google. “Google Docs: Online Word Processing for Business | G Suite.” G Suite: Collaboration & Productivity Apps for Business, gsuite.google.com/products/docs/?utm_source=google &utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=na-US-all-en-dr-bkws-all-all-trial-b-dr-1007175&utm_content=text-ad-none-any-DEV_c-CRE_337191507243-ADGP_Hybrid%20%7C%20AW%20SEM%20%7C%20BKWS%20~%20BMM%20%2F%2F%20Docs%20%5B1:1%5D%20Google%20Docs-KWID_43700009812540086-kwd-25567368937&utm_term=KW_%2Bdocs-ST_%2Bdocs&gclid=CjwKCAjwusrtBRBmEiwAGBPgE_qy5MMzrqaOM62xDFVFLLtvn_nwrEFDGEOC0jweeCdr3X6EF3R9ZBoCg44QAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds.

Leave a comment

Filed under Profile

The Keats-Shelley Review

The Keats-Shelley Review is a scholarly journal that has been published bi-annually by The Keats-Shelley Memorial Association for more than one hundred years. It is accessible through the Angelo and Jennette Volpe Library at Tennessee Technological University in both print and digital formats, and a limited amount of articles can also be found on The Keats-Shelley Memorial Association’s website. The journal is edited by James Grande alongside an editorial board of international constituency and is known for having a “longstanding status as a prestigious journal of major literary and critical significance,” according to the introductory information of the thirteenth volume (The Keats Shelley Memorial Association 1999). 

The Keats-Shelley Review publishes a wide range of materials including articles, poems, notes on contributors, abstracts, news, book reviews, and essays. Submissions such as articles and essays are recommended to be at least five thousand words, but are limited to no more than eight thousand words. The journal and all of its submissions are centered around romanticism, John Keats, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and their circle. John Keats and Percy Shelley were major English romantic poets in the nineteenth century. They knew each other and ran in many of the same circles. Prominent members of their group included Mary Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, Lord Byron, Leigh Hunt, and John Polidori, and all of which are commonly discussed throughout the numerous volumes of the journal.

As expected, the most common topics throughout The Keats-Shelley Review are, in fact, John Keats and Percy Shelley. Each volume contains numerous articles and other submissions of the above listed types that are about John Keats’ or Percy Shelley’s character, life, or works. Some examples of the submissions one might expect to see that discuss the character and lives of John Keats and Percy Shelly are articles such as “Keats And Coldness” by James Burton, “Shelley’s Eternal Time: Harmonizing Form And Content In Prometheus Unbound” by Jeffrey A. Schwarz, and “Keats’s Lover’s Discourse And The Letters To Fanny Brawne” by Nichola Deane. Articles and submissions discussing or explaining the works of John Keats and Shelley can also be found, among them being “ ‘My Spirit sought/ To Weave a Bondage of Such Sympathy’: Sympathy, Enthusiasm and Revolution in Laon and Cythna” by Alessandra Monorchio. 

Submissions that are published within the journal can also relate less directly to John Keats and Percy Shelley by being about the members of their inner circle. For example, “ ‘Come Kick Me’: Godwin’s Memoirs And The Posthumous Infamy Of Mary Wollstonecraft” by Amy Rambow, featuring intreguing subtitles like “Suicide, Salvation, And Sex,” “Kingsborough Scandals,” “Obscurity And Reintegration,” and “Premarital Sex.” Another example is “ ‘A Higher And More Extended Comprehension’: Byron’s Three Weeks In Rome” by Peter Cochran.

Yet another topic for works published within the journal is romanticism, simply because John Keats and Percy Shelly were romantic writers. An article titled “Reception Of Romanticism In Japan Before World War II” by Akiko Okada is a prime example of this. Although it does not directly make mention to John Keats or Percy Shelley, this article belongs in The Keats-Shelley Review because its main subject is romanticism.

Lastly, and perhaps most surprisingly, the journal also includes poetry submissions and excerpts. The Keats-Shelley Memorial Association even hosts a contest and rewards a first and second prize to the two best poems in honor of John Keats and Percy Shelley. The winners are then given a monetary prize and their poem is published in that year’s volume; however, it is important to note that the poems within the journal are not limited to those entered into the contest. The Keats-Shelley Millennium Poetry Prize winner from volume fifteen in 2001 was an interesting poem titled “The Nightingale Broadcasts” by Robert Saxton. Some poems throughout volume thirty two, issue two include three poems by Mattew Sweeney: “Autumn,” “Into The Air,” and “The Parrot’s Soliloquy.” 

Simply put, The Keats-Shelley Review is a well-established, accessible journal that is supported and published by The Keats-Shelley Memorial Association. The journal covers John Keats, Percy Shelley, and many more less obvious topics. With an extensive shelf-life, the journal is a reputable and useful source for Keats-Shelley fans, romantic enthusiasts, lovers of literature, and college students, specifically English majors. 

Works Cited 

Burton, James. “Keats And Coldness.” The Keats-Shelley Review, vol. 13, 1999, pp. 15-23.

Cochran, Peter. “‘A Higher And More Extended Comprehension’: Byron’s Three Weeks In Rome.” The Keats-Shelley Review, vol. 15, 2001, pp. 49-63.

Deane, Nicola. “Keats’s Lover’s Discourse And The Letters To Fanny Brawne.” The Keats-Shelley Review, vol. 13, 1999, pp. 105-114.

The Keats-Shelley Memorial Association. The Keats-Shelley Review, vol. 13, 1999.

The Keats-Shelley Memorial Association. The Keats-Shelley Review, vol. 15, 2001.

The Keats-Shelley Memorial Association. The Keats-Shelley Review, vol. 32, no. 2, 2018.

Monorchio, Alessandra. “‘My Spirit sought/ To Weave a Bondage of Such Sympathy’: Sympathy, Enthusiasm and Revolution in Laon and Cythna.” The Keats-Shelley Review, vol. 32, no. 2, 2018, pp. 123-133.

Okada, Akiko. “Reception Of Romanticism In Japan Before World War II.” The Keats-Shelley Review, vol. 15, 2001, pp. 88-106.

Rambow, Amy. “‘Come Kick Me’: Godwin’s Memoirs And The Posthumous Infamy Of Mary Wollstonecraft.” The Keats-Shelley Review, vol. 13, 1999, pp. 24-57.

Saxton, Robert. “The Nightingale Broadcasts.” The Keats-Shelley Review, vol. 15, 2001, pp. 11-12.

Schwarz, Jeffrey A. “Shelley’s Eternal Time: Harmonizing Form And Content In Prometheus Unbound.” The Keats-Shelley Review, vol. 13, 1999, pp. 76-87.

Sweeney, Matthew. “Autumn.” The Keats-Shelley Review, vol. 32, no. 2, 2018, p. 176.

Sweeney, Matthew. “Into The Air.” The Keats-Shelley Review, vol. 32, no. 2, 2018, p. 177.

Leave a comment

Filed under Profile